| |
| Price-Tagging
Nature? Outrageous! |
|
 |
What Prof
Quah proposes is simply outrageous!
Land plots in commerce may have price tags but woes begone to those
who think that Nature has a price tag too. And his suggesting that
Chek Jawa is too ‘ad hoc in guiding future decisions’ is deadpan irrationality.
Anything that is first and defining in occurrence is a possible benchmark.
What make Prof Quah think we should follow him to the opposite direction?
Not only is the nerve of reasoning negative, it is also nothing new
at all. It is invocating the same old ways of our present economy
that is destroying the fabric we call Nature – the very same life-sustaining
fabric for human beings, DAH! It is precisely this same old problem
we are grabbling to resolve. So, in the end, Prof Quah has really
nothing to offer except to say, ‘let’s just carry on what we are doing’.
And I may add to his line of thought – ‘…. and die!’
Increasingly, people across the world are beginning to realize that
the source of our redemption lies in our most primitive cultures that
advocate 'living with Nature'. This is particularly true in eastern
philosophy. There is a lot of enlightenment to be found. Prof Quah
should look here, not the West for answers (since he is on this side
of the globe). However, if he is still inclined towards the West,
why, he should look to the American Indians for inspiration, not half-baked
new economic models.
The nature of the auction that he advocates is as questionable and
controversial as the ‘representative sample of the stake-holding segment’
that he is advancing. Who is he going to ask? Well, don’t ask it in
my name. The future of our children cannot be decided this way.
As to Prof Peter Ng’s reported statement, I am a wee-bit confused.
But alas, should I be surprised at all by now? Isn’t he part of the
team that has pitched for the conversion of the 30ha plot of Mandai
forest into a spa? Well, in all eventuality, I think Prof Quah and
Prof Ng should make great bedfellows indeed.
Find out what the true value of a forest is at: Forest
Science Crapped in Singapore
& read other comments in Nature
Over Man Blog.
Joe Lai
25 Jan 2008 |
|